For SCIDA to approve this PILOT before the court hears the cases would be injudicious. If Mr. Sherron's assertion is correct (CWW disagrees with his interpretation) that SCIDA can lawfully approve PILOT's after construction has started, there should be no immediate or compelling need to authorize the PILOT for either UPC Prattsburgh or Cohocton Projects, at this time and with tax exemptions purported.
SCIDA Application Discrepancies, Resolution and Removal of Code Enforcement Officer 01/23/08

SCIDA Application Discrepancies, Resolution and Removal of Code Enforcement Officer 01/23/08
(via batr.net)
Submitted by cohoctonwindwatch on Fri, 2008-01-25 02:47.
» login to post comments